Bookslut

Bookslut

  • Home
  • Features
  • Reviews
  • Columns
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Advertise
« April 2010 | Main | June 2010 »

May 28, 2010

More love for Walker Percy's crazy Lost in the Cosmos: The Last Self-Help Book. Another excerpt:

Question: Why was not a single table designed as such rather than being a non-table doing duty as a table?

Because people have gotten tired of ordinary tables.

Because the fifty non-tables converted to tables make good conversation pieces.

Because it is a chance to make use of valuable odds and ends which would otherwise gather dust in the attic.

Because the self in the twentieth century is a voracious nought which expands like the feeding vacuole of an amoeba seeking to nourish and inform its own nothingness by ingesting new objects in the world but, like a vacuole, only succeeds in emptying them out. (CHECK ONE)

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

Right! Last reminder about tonight, and our reading with Lorraine Adams here in Berlin.

Friday 28th May
19:30 – 21:30
Café Hilde
Metzer Straße 22
10405 Berlin
FREE ENTRY

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

May 27, 2010

Miranda Carter discusses her engrossing biography George, Nicholas and Wilhelm: Three Royal Cousins and the Road to World War I.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

Today's reminder about Lorraine Adam's reading (tomorrow!) here in Berlin. Her latest book The Room and the Chair has racked up positive reviews from Bookforum, the New York Times, and the Washington Post, and you can read an excerpt at the Wall Street Journal.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

NPR is running my review of Anthropology of an American Girl by Hilary Hamann (read my interview with Hamann at PBS Need to Know).

It's Eveline's voice — equal parts pretentious and poetic, bratty and poignant, wise and naive — that saves the book. It captures exactly the thought processes of an introspective teenage girl. Her worldview is sharp and dead-on. On seeing her absent father at graduation: "It depressed me somewhat to be faced with my DNA like that." On femininity: "Girls are truly game as soldiers, with the brave things they do to their bodies and the harsh conditions they are able to tolerate." On being a teenage girl: "When you're fourteen, pretty much everything puts you in a difficult predicament."

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

Third-wave feminist guidebook Manifesta has been re-released in a 10th anniversary edition, as if it deserved such distinction, as if it did something when it was originally released, rather than just pat Sassy subscribers on the head for being sooooo engaged. Boats, it did not rock. Minds, they did not change. Revolutions are not started with the suggestion that you should start a women's book club and maybe try lesbianism. Bookforum has a nice little take down.

In one corner, the sensibly dressed second-waver, defiantly overweight, highly suspicious of the fairy-princess aisle at Toys "R" Us. In another, the young third-waver in a miniskirt and heels, busy either painting her nails or knitting something, tattooed, carrying her keys in a Hello Kitty lunch box. "A feminist, not the fun kind," is how Andrea Dworkin chose to define herself. Feminism can be "relevant and fun and in the moment," counter Baumgardner and Richards, who, curiously, don't seem to be having much fun at all.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

May 26, 2010

Sometimes you're having a psychic breakthrough. Other times you are simply secretly dying of a bizarre infection. Michael Greenberg, who had a column at the Times Literary Supplement for years, seems to have taken up with Bookforum. His first installment, "A Strange Fever," is up now.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

Garrison Keillor is writing ridiculous things about the publishing industry at the New York Times, setting them at "glamorous" New York Book Expo parties. Ah, it brings back memories... specifically of losing the strength to get back to the Javits Center, and my friend E asking, "Would you rather just drink bourbon and watch some Miami Vice with me?" And yes, I would. (Link via Maud.)

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

This is your daily reminder about Lorraine Adams's reading on Friday!

I especially liked the boozy, loopy Mabel character in Adams's book The Room and the Chair, the woman who used to be a journalist but married a superstar journalist and now just dodders around. And I especially like this little rant she goes on when the subject of whether a woman named Martina might be hired for the managing editor position at the newspaper:

[Mabel:] "Is she good looking?"

[Stanley:] "I thought so. An unusual beauty..."

"Well, she wouldn't have been managing editor, then. At that level they only tolerate horsy women, matron mamas, bucket-face bags. Semi-fatties do well too. Face it: a brainy woman of any beauty is dead meat in the Room. It's the Jamesian effect."

Stanley was trying to get over the word "fatties." His eyes were unblinking. "Jamesian effect?" he finally got out.

"Anyone worthy of being a Victorian heroine is unworthy of success in any male pecking order. For one, their wives would flip. Here I am, staying home raising your kids, and you're promoting her! For two, they'd be too distracted and tempted to do the conforming to one another's ideas they expend so much energy doing. For three, they're all a little afraid of being risible, like Lev and -- who's that intern he married -- Meg. It's a category: husbands with intellectually embarrassing wives who are too pretty to be unobtrusive.

"No, the dirty little secret is these liberal men, these anti-sexual-harassment, pro-women's-rights lip-service providers, they all opt for wives as wallpaper. They're more in love with ambition than love. So poor Martina. Yeah. She never had a chance. What's that great, great, great Madonna line? 'Could you be a little less.' That's what girls come to know in our enlightened times. 'Could you be a little less.'"

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

I'm so happy to have had the chance to have a little chat with Hilary Hamann, author of Anthropology of an American Girl. Because not only did we get to talk about her thoughtful and beautiful book, we also got to talk about her years of running a micro-publisher, Vernacular Press, and she said some genius things. Like: "Ironically, as hard as money is to come by, it’s often easier to come by than faith, optimism and courage." That's the truest thing about running your own business I've ever heard.

Also, about friendships between teenage girls:

I started the description of the relationship between girls exactly at moment in which it’s most threatened — when the expert intimacy best friends have cultivated with each other gets transferred to boys. Nothing more tragic than that transfer of intimacy “resources” has to happen between women. Though obviously there are exceptions, it’s safe to say that the pattern is the rule. Friendships between girls don’t crash and burn, they tend to disintegrate.

The whole interview is running at the PBS Need to Know website.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

May 25, 2010

I just found out that one of my favorite sci-fi writers is a raging homophobe. Should I prevent my son from reading the jerk’s books?

The game of guess-who is actually not that difficult. But our own Michael Schaub helps provide the guy with an answer.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

All of my favorite dead men are coming out tonight. Melvyn Bragg and "guests" discuss William James's Varieties of Religious Experience at BBC4. For 45 minutes. I am in geeked out heaven. (Aided by the appearance today of Christianity: The First Three Thousand Years on my doorstep. Now if I could figure out how to carry it around with me without causing nerve damage, I would be set.)

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

Selina Hastings's biography of Somerset Maugham is finally seeing a US release, probably delayed by the general consensus that Maugham is someone your grandmother really liked. But it is no secret that I think he is brilliant, and I'm making my way through his Collected Stories (multiple volumes) right now. (I also reviewed Hastings's biography for the Smart Set for the UK release last year. On Maud Newton's couch. Which is where I left the book. It's been too long, Maud.)

Hastings talks about the trouble about writing about Maugham, who was incredibly secretive and tried to destroy or restrict access to as much information about him as possible. Which reminds me: Dear Maud Newton: Please be sure to permanently delete the volumes of drunk emails I have sent you over the years. Much love, JC.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

On the familial legacy of Vita Sackville-West:

Vita described her family as “a race too prodigal, too amorous, too weak, too indolent, and too melancholy”: in short, “a rotten lot, and nearly all stark-staring mad”.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

Lorraine Adams (guest of the Berlin Bookslut Reading Series on Friday, just to remind you) has set her new novel The Room and the Chair in part in a Washington DC newspaper office. And while the book expresses faith in reporters, it is not, on the whole, yay yay about the future of newspapers and journalism. She was on the BBC yesterday, being attacked for her cynicism, but she holds her own nicely.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

May 24, 2010

Colette on the library in her childhood home -- a beguiling description of the materiality of books:

Through the open top of its shade, the lamp cast its beams upon a wall entirely corrugated by the backs of books, all bound. The opposite wall was yellow, a dirty yellow of the paper-backed volumes, read, re-read, and in tatters. A few "Translated from the English" -– price one franc twenty-five –- gave a scarlet note to the bottom shelf.

Half-way up, Musset, Voltaire, and the Gospels gleamed in their leaf-brown sheepskin. Littré, Larousse, and Becquerel displayed bulging backs like black tortoises, while d’Orbigny, pulled to pieces by the irreverent adoration of four children, scattered its pages blazoned with dahlias, parrots, pink-fringed jellyfish, and duck-billed platypi.

Camille Flammarion, in gold-starred blue, contained the yellow planets, the chalk-white frozen craters of the moon, and Saturn rolling within his orbit like an iridescent pearl.

Two solid earth-coloured partitions held together Élisée Reclus, Voltaire in marbled boards, Balzac in black, and Shakespeare in olive-green.

All these years, I have only had to shut my eyes to see once more those walls faced with books. In those days I could find them in the dark. I never took a lamp when I went at night to choose one, it was enough to feel my way, as though on the keyboard of a piano, along the shelves.

From My Mother’s House, 1922

Posted by Catherine Gregg | link

Our super sexy reading series is finally getting off the ground in Berlin, debuting with Lorraine Adams, the fine author of Harbor and her latest The Room and the Chair. So come, drink, listen to Adams read and the Q&A I'll be conducting with her, buy a book and get it signed, and hang out with Berlin's Prenzlauer Berg finest. Details below:

Lorraine Adams is a novelist, critic and Pulitzer Prize winning journalist. Her new novel, her second, is The Room and the Chair, and it moves from Afghanistan to an American newspaper, from Iran to Washington DC. She populates the novel with the normally silent participants in America’s fight against terrorism — the cub reporter, the Iranian nuclear scientist, the women in the military, and the midlevel editors and military men who wield no real power and cannot stop the madness they see around them. Like her first book Harbor, which told the story of an Algerian refugee newly on America’s shores, Adams has a knack for illuminating the headlines of the day, bringing humanity and a sense of timelessness to the issues that plague us. She will be in conversation with Bookslut.com editor Jessa Crispin.

Friday 28th May
19:30 – 21:30
Café Hilde
Metzer Straße 22
10405 Berlin
FREE ENTRY

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

May 21, 2010

The NYRB Classics is apparently experiencing an overwhelming demand for JG Farrell's Troubles -- the book is going back for a large reprinting. Meanwhile, their blog is posting excerpts from Farrell's diaries and letters on the creation and inspiration for the work.

"Troubles went off to the printer a couple of weeks ago at long last—I was beginning to think it would never get there. I understand that they plan to publish it in September. However, to say that excitement is running high in the book world about its forthcoming appearance would be an exaggeration. Indeed, excitement seems to be running low here, and even lower in the US where, after months of study and a course of electric shock treatment the editor in chief of Harper and Row reached the conclusion that he didn't know whether he wanted it or not."

(And if you're stuck waiting for a copy, remember he has two other books in that trilogy, both swimmingly good. (Although... nothing is like Troubles.)

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

“I suppose it starts to happen first in the suburbs. … People starting to come apart." Ruth Franklin on the gothic domesticity of Shirley Jackson.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

I am currently in the middle of Jillian Weise's The Colony and loving it. I love that Charles Darwin shows up, drinking mint juleps and telling the character to wear a red miniskirt. More on the book later, but for now, from the New York Times, Weise on becoming a cyborg.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

When I met Grant Achatz, the chef at Alinea, that dude was vibrating with ambition and smarts. You could audibly hear his synapses firing. I wasn't sure if I envied it or was afraid of it -- probably both. I have a very foggy, misdirected ambition, like someone who has been buried in an avalanche and realizes they've been digging down instead of up for the past five minutes.

And then there is my desire to fall into an Alice James state. And so, at the Smart Set, brought on by Susan Wolf's Meaning In Life: And Why It Matters, Hans Magnus Enzensburg's The Silences of Hammerstein, and Becoming William James, and a bonus Brian Eno lyric rip-off, a new column about taking to your bed with the vapors:

There have been Sundays, in bed, in a hotel room, hungover or not, wherein my prospects for getting out of bed seem slim, what with the television right there, and the remote control so near my head. Despite hundreds of channels and the free HBO — generally just showing something directed by Ron Howard over and over and over again — I will stop on Joel Osteen or Rick Warren or some other reprehensible creature in a mega church of some sort. On those Sundays, it's hard to feel the repulsion I usually have for such views. It's the perfect hair and the shiny, shiny teeth. These men are always telling me that God has plans for me. "Oh, Joel Osteen," I say out loud to the television. "Tell me what those plans are."

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

May 20, 2010

Kay Ryan looks back at her tenure as the poet laureate: I feel like I’ve gotten better at it as time passed, but at first it felt very ridiculous to suddenly find oneself in the cloak of the laureateship. But gradually one becomes more accustomed to it.

John Basinger is back in the news again for memorizing Paradise Lost in its entirety. What's fun this time is the Courant reporter's bafflement: It's tempting to think that, having memorized 60,000 words of text, Basinger's brain would run out of room to retain much else. Seamon said memory doesn't work that way.

How would your poems fare under the poetry rubric? Wow.

Spencer Bailey believes that the place of poetry in American middlebrow discourse is secure: It can be argued that poetry is more vital today than ever before, because people are faced with the media’s never-ending news cycle. "The publication of poetry is essential in our time," says Schulman. "Particularly in our time with electronics, with the news reaching us so fast, and changing like a kaleidoscope every day. It gives us lasting values and imprints on our consciousness truths that simply do not appear in the day-by-day rush of events." Bailey and Schulman are probably right, since this argument about poetry vs. speed is now 212 years old. (Via HTMLGIANT.)

At PennSound: Alice Notley and Alicia Cohen, in a reading from May 1.

Posted by Jason B. Jones | link

The Lost Booker was not won by Sawyer, Michelle Rodriguez, or any other of the people from that show I'm too dim to follow.

It was won, delightfully, by JG Farrell, for Troubles. James Gordon was not available for comment, having been dead since 1979 in dodgy Lost-worthy circumstances. The Guardian has an extract from the winning 1970 novel up.

Posted by Margaret Howie | link

I'm doing a series on travel writing for the PBS Need to Know website that will continue through the summer. First up, Sara Wheeler's Magnetic North, about her travels in the Arctic Circle, which was just nominated for a Samuel Johnson prize for nonfiction writing. If I get to work in Travels with a Donkey, I'll be a happy lady.

I used to subscribe to Outside magazine. Not that I needed the tips on hiking boots or information on cutting edge mountain bike technology — what I really liked were the tales of either horrible death or I-survived-but-I-am-now-missing-a-few-toes. There was always someone getting trapped on the side of a mountain, or having to walk 50 miles out of the Amazon after their homemade lightweight aircraft crashed. I’m sure there are people who read these stories of bravery and adventure and thought, “I am totally hiking in Brazil for my next vacation,” but I always read the stories curled up on the couch, under a blanket, eating a stack of Saltine crackers, and thinking cozily to myself, “This is something I will never, ever have to deal with.”

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

May 19, 2010

As I'm pretty sure I'm slowly becoming as bonkers as Boswell (with his anxiety, his endless lists of how to be a man, his hypochondria) in my old age, let's mark the anniversary of his death with some dirty diary entries of his. (Via)

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

This week's Guardian Digested Read: Hitch-22 by Christopher Hitchens.

I find I have written nothing of my wives, save that they are fortunate to have been married to me, and nothing of my emotional life. That is because I don't have one. The only feeling I have is of being right, and that has been with me all my life.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

A rainy day in Berlin has me trolling archives, finding things I may have missed seven years ago or whenever. Like, this profile of Brian Evenson, who was kicked out of the Mormon church after he published a book with stories that started with lines like, "Having sewn Jarry’s eyelids shut, Hébé found himself at a loss as to how to proceed." (He later wrote the creepy The Open Curtain, set in the Mormon church, giving away secrets that will surely send him to hell.)

Also, the archives of Outside are always great. I didn't realize they have the entirety of Jon Krakauer's Into Thin Air (the article version, not the book version) available, not even behind a pay wall. Bless them. They also have a story that starts with the kicker:

At the bottom of the biggest underwater cave in the world, diving deeper than almost anyone had ever gone, Dave Shaw found the body of a young man who had disappeared ten years earlier. What happened after Shaw promised to go back is nearly unbelievable—unless you believe in ghosts.

Yes, I'll be getting to that as soon as I make another pot of tea.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

Columbia Journalism Review credits Cornelius Ryan's epic account of D-Day, The Longest Day, with the birth of Journalism as Literature. (Link via TMN.)

Over the years the trade had produced occasional flashes of inspiration in which a writer—Daniel Defoe, Rebecca West, Joseph Mitchell, W. C. Heinz, John Hersey—took a turn at bringing to a true story the qualities of fiction. But those moments came, and always went, and did not much alter the journalistic landscape. That began to change in 1957, when Cornelius Ryan, staked by the least hip of all magazines, Reader’s Digest, began placing ads in newspapers and trade publications, searching for men and women who had been in Normandy that day. From those ads sprung a great journalistic enterprise that would culminate, two years later, with the publication of The Longest Day.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

The Nebula Awards 2009 have just been announced. The LA Times points out that it's a good year for indie publishers/producers.

Best novel: The Windup Girl - Paolo Bacigalupi

Best Novella: The Women of Nell Gwynne’s - Kage Baker

Novelette: “Sinner, Baker, Fabulist, Priest; Red Mask, Black Mask, Gentleman, Beast” - Eugie Foster

Short Story: “Spar” Kij Johnson

Ray Bradbury Award: District 9 - Neill Blomkamp and Terri Tatchell

Andre Norton Award: The Girl Who Circumnavigated Fairyland in a Ship of Her Own Making - Catherynne M. Valente

Posted by Margaret Howie | link

May 18, 2010

Longtime Bookslut favorite Daniel Nester: "I prank-called the Iowa MFA program to ask about writing lyric essays, and got put on hold. Take a listen."

Posted by Michael Schaub | link

The Telegraph has a feature on the posthumous return of neglected writer Austin Wright. They also have an extract of Tony and Susan, one of six books being reissued.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

May 17, 2010

The Second Virtue

I found this colourful kids encyclopaedia in a charity shop and before I do the dastardly and cut it up to sell the pictures, I thought I’d share a page. This is what it has to say on dogs: 

Dogs can run fast

And they can swim.

They are slow swimmers.

Dogs can learn to do tricks.

They can sit up and beg.

They can balance on one leg

or do a dance.

They can climb ladders

And jump through hoops.

Dogs are very intelligent.

They bark and wag their tails

to make us understand.

It seems sometimes that dogs can almost talk,

They are such good

friends to man. 

I think it’s my new favourite poem.  

Posted by Catherine Gregg | link

Smart Set deadline today, and Hans Magnus Enzensberger's The Silences of Hammerstein unexpectedly snuck its way in. While this Guardian profile says he's one of the most high profile author voices in Germany despite never producing a classic German novel, I quite like his strange nonfiction blends of essay, history, biography, imaginary conversations, news clippings, etc. And he responds:

"An interesting German novel is much rarer than an interesting English-language novel," he says. "Unlike the Russians, the French and the English, we don't have a very great novel tradition. We've had a number of interesting writers in the 20th century – Musil, Roth, Kafka, Sebald – but they are all one-offs. Our mainstream novels are like German cars. There is a certain core competence and diligence, but you couldn't say that they are particularly exciting or surprising or interesting."

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

When my friend was writing a blog entry for the Wall Street Journal about Joss Whedon, our conversations got on the subject of Dollhouse, which is pretty easy for us to do. His final version:

“Firefly” also introduced the odd thematic obsession around prostitution and rescue that took over and imploded in the near-future science fiction show “Dollhouse,” about a brainwashing technology that gives rise to high-tech brothels, and (much more entertainingly) Armageddon. There was something confused and unprocessed there - I felt I was watching an artist working with material he wasn’t yet in control of.

I think I eventually just said, "I don't think men should get to write from the perspective of female prostitutes. Unless they take a class or something." Turns out Joss Whedon maybe did take a class! According to the "Internet." It just didn't help.

Now I have a book that came into my apartment over the weekend that I can't stop messing with, even though it hurts my brain. It's a revenge novel. About a dude. Whose girl is raped. And he has to go on a killing spree. Of course he does. The author should also maybe take a class, taught by Virginie Despentes. Or just read her book King Kong Theory. In her movie Baise Moi, a woman who has just been raped tells her (abusive) boyfriend, and he starts raging about how he will find and kill those motherfuckers, etc. She shoots him in the head. From the book:

People keep telling you: it's serious, it's a crime, if a man who loves you finds out, it will drive him crazy with pain and rage (rape is also a private conversation, in which a man declares to other men, I will fuck your women whenever I please).

and on the idea of the revenge rampage:

You never see news items about girls -- alone or in gangs -- biting off the dicks of men who attack them, or trailing their attackers to kill them or beat them lifeless. This only happens, for the moment, in films directed by men. Wes Craven's The Last House on the Left, Ferrara's Ms. 45, Meir Zarchi's I Spit on Your Grave, for instance. All three films open with more or less horrible rape scenes (rather more than less, in fact), and go on to depict in a second part the ultraviolent revenges inflicted on their attackers by the women. When men create female characters, it is rarely an attempt to understand what the characters are experiencing and feeling as women. It tends instead to be a way of depicting male sensibility in a female body. So in these three films, you see how men, if they were women, would react to rape. A bloodbath of merciless violence. Their message is clear, "Why don't you defend yourselves more fiercely?"

There's a section about prostitution, too. Just in case Joss Whedon feels the need to re-explore the subject.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

The great Peter Nadas (A Book of Memories, The End of a Family Story, etc) talks to Die Zeit about the right wing domination of the recent Hungarian elections and Hungary's role in Europe.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

In the good news category: Pamela Ribon has a new book out, Going in Circles. (I read her first book hidden in my lap at work. Yes, I am totally typing right now, don't mind me. Also, from that era: my interview with her on Bookslut.) She's at Largehearted Boy with his Book Notes series, talking about break-up music.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

Brodeck's Report by Philippe Claudel has won The International Prize for Foreign Fiction 2010. Claudel's translator John Cullen will share in the £10,000 prize. Judge Boyd Tonkin interviewed Claudel for the Independent:

For 11 satisfying years, he worked as a teacher in prisons. "All the people who came to my lessons were volunteers," he says. "For a teacher, these were the ideal conditions!"

Posted by Margaret Howie | link

May 14, 2010

Michael Schaub reviews the new Peter Carey, Parrot and Olivier in America at NPR.

Stories about two mismatched people who hate each other at first but eventually become friends got old about 500 cop buddy movies ago, but Carey's novel is smart, charming and original enough to transcend that formula.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

May 13, 2010


At the Poetry Foundation, Harriet is sporting a new multimedia feature, "Open Door," devoted to "performance, scholarship, and engagement outside the usual boundaries of slams, workshops, and book publications." Up now: Matthew Simmons's look at Seattle's Interrupture: when asked to describe what exactly Interrupture is, Mason says simply, "We’re a word band." Mason first suggested the idea of a game-based word performance to Comiskey and others. "We get together. We practice. We have rotating members," Mason continues, "People come in, learn the different games." There's video, for the dubious. I love the "Open Door" concept. Some will inevitably argue that it just re-installs the very division between insider and public poetry that it claims to move beyond, but it's great to read thoughtful pieces about performance, location, and poetry. You know? (Also, since there's a puppy mentioned in the article, I get show off my kid's new puppy, Athena.)

Amy King answers "ten questions on poets and technology": If every poet were to record just one book of poems that they loved for the rest of us to listen to, and not just their own poems, how excellent would that be? And if those recordings could be streamed on the iPod or through a phone application? Who wouldn’t be checking out what book of poems Ashbery read for us? Ana Bozicevic loves X’s book so much that she spent two hours reading it for us! Jeni Olin read X! Can’t wait to listen!

Speaking of technology and poetry: If you were a poet and online in those days, everything changed on April 1, 2004, when an anonymously run website called Foetry.com launched, its tagline "Exposing fraudulent contests. Tracking the sycophants. Naming names." Daniel Nester interviews Alan Cordle about Foetry.com.

Helena Fitzgerald on rock: mourning is the essential action of rock music. It’s a genre defined less by particular chord progressions or musical requirements than  by sadness. Rock and roll is happy music about sad things. That's really smart. For an excellent example of "happy music about sad things," I have a suggestion.

Gibby Haynes, of The Butthole Surfers, chats with Joe Wenderoth, of Letters to Wendy, No Real Light, etc. (Via Harriet.) It's hard to excerpt, but here's Wenderoth: The only other fish that rivals the Piranha, in my view, is that fish they just found evidence of—the one that developed legs to walk from puddle to puddle, way back when. That struggle—not the struggle to cross the no-fish-land of between-the-puddles, but the struggle TO GROW THE BODY that would for the first time make the attempt possible—that struggle reminds me of my own struggle to get from morning to night. (Back in the day, Wenderoth explained how he met Haynes.)

Posted by Jason B. Jones | link

David B. Hart is taking a beating. His article "Believe It or Not" kind of starts as a review of 50 Voices of Disbelief: Why We Are Atheists but quickly becomes a throw down against New Atheism. It is funny and vital and true, and I think these things because I agree with him, but there are a lot of people who do not. Like, so far, approximately 446 of them. And they are all yelling at one another. But this goes against my never actually achieved resolution to stop for the love of god reading comments sections, so maybe just read the essay.

I am not—honestly, I am not—simply being dismissive here. The utter inconsequentiality of contemporary atheism is a social and spiritual catastrophe. Something splendid and irreplaceable has taken leave of our culture—some great moral and intellectual capacity that once inspired the more heroic expressions of belief and unbelief alike. Skepticism and atheism are, at least in their highest manifestations, noble, precious, and even necessary traditions, and even the most fervent of believers should acknowledge that both are often inspired by a profound moral alarm at evil and suffering, at the corruption of religious institutions, at psychological terrorism, at injustices either prompted or abetted by religious doctrines, at arid dogmatisms and inane fideisms, and at worldly power wielded in the name of otherworldly goods. In the best kinds
of unbelief, there is something of the moral grandeur of the prophets—a deep and admirable abhorrence of those vicious idolatries that enslave minds and justify our worst cruelties.

It is just a very good piece of writing.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

This review of Anthony Sattin's A Winter on the Nile: Florence Nightingale, Gustave Flaubert and the Temptations of Egypt just made me desperate to read the book. (Link via.)

There are two travellers, an English woman and a French man, both in their late twenties. They are eloquently self-aware and profoundly unhappy. They are hoping to find a new purpose to their lives. They arrive in Egypt in November 1849, within days of each other. They stay in adjacent hotels. They travel along the same river, and they visit the same places at the same season of the year. They confide their secrets to their journals. They write vivid letters home. For two days they are to be found on the upper and the lower decks of the same steamship, plodding along the lower Nile from Alexandria to Cairo.

These two young travellers, so nicely oblivious of each other, are Florence Nightingale and Gustave Flaubert. Within seven years of their journey along the Nile both will be famous, she as the saviour of the wounded soldiers of the Crimean War, he as the author of Madame Bovary. His novel will be the classic description of the subjection of women. Her mission to the Crimea will foreshadow their emancipation. At this point in their lives, though, their primary creative energies are paralysed. Egypt may transform them.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

I love yesterday, I deplore today, and I am hopeful of tomorrow because it can't be so bad as today.

I am tired of "new writing" and of "powerful new novelists." I am tired of today's new people; I am tired of their lives, of their tastes, their reading, their language, their singing, their sedatives and their psychiatrists, their houses, their furniture, and their faces.

What am I most tired of? Today's arid poets.

What do I most loathe? Today's rancid sex books.

All this being so, I have written about what I most love. And I love more things than I loathe.

- The ever charming Margaret Anderson, from her memoir The Strange Necessity, about her life running the literary magazine The Little Review. I was thinking about her as the New Yorker gets ready to run a list of 20 Hot! Young! Writers!, and given the fiction they run these days, from a very predictable pool of the same fucking authors week after week*, my response to the whole thing would be similar to Anderson's.

So when the New Yorker list comes out, remember there is still Alejandro Zambra. And Joanna Kavenna. And Lorraine Adams. And Dubravka Ugresic. And Shalom Auslander. And other brilliant people who will not be on that list.

And when I am of her age, I hope I am able to take such a fucking hot passport photo that I use it on the cover of my goddamn book. Holy hell.

* Fine writers, all. But other writers exist.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

May 12, 2010

The Naked and the Read

A sensuality exists, I’ve just now come to know, in reading a book from the library. That others, strangers, who knows who, have fingered the same pages, rested the spine in their palm, laid hands on cover front and back -- there’s something intimate about that shared touch. And not just the invisible fingerprints, there’s more lasting evidence of other people’s presence: a booger wiped and dried, a moth or a mosquito slammed dead between the pages. And the smell, of course. Vinegar and dust and elementary school.

The physical human presence hasn’t kept me away from the library. But I have not been one to borrow books. Because: what happens if I love it? What if I don’t want to give it back? I tend not to borrow books from people for the same reason -- or give them ample warning that if I love it, or like it a lot, or like it at all, chances are I’ll want to keep it. And, childishly, I have a difficult time lending my books, too, fearing others will thieve like me. I put a copy of a collection of Conrad stories -- a treasured book for where and when I read it -- in the mail to Nigeria this past fall with a love note to my beau who was working there for thirty days and was looking for dark adventure stories. It felt like some small step: a new generosity, a minor letting go. It’s just a book after all, and I liked the idea of it being in his hands so far away. That it didn’t make it there -- lost somewhere between here and Calabar -- was no surprise. An empty slot remains on the shelf it used to live.

The impulse to own books, to buy them new, have them be just yours, it’s an onanistic urge, self-pleasing, party of one. To borrow a book others have read, the conversation gets expanded. Is it overstating to say it’s more an orgy? Probably. But I think there’s something to be said for knowing that others hands have held what you now hold, that the same sentences have been read by someone else, in bed, perhaps, or on a train. Some connection is achieved, to the readers both before and after you, one that can’t quite be felt when a book’s bought new and held only by your hands.

There’s a simple and astonishing moment in a short Chekhov story called “The Student,” in which the student relays the story of Peter betraying Jesus to an old widow, comparing her gardens to the gardens he imagines Peter and Jesus spoke. The widow weeps to hear it. The student is struck by that, and “joy suddenly stirred in his soul, and he even stopped for a moment to catch his breath. The past, he thought, is connected with the present in an unbroken chain of events flowing one out of the other. And it seemed to him that he had just seen both ends of that chain: he touched one end, and the other moved.”

Again, it’s overstating it to say that I felt that level of epiphany reading a book from the library last week -- but it was something like it. Instead of being hoardy and private about books and reading, some new sense of communion resulted.

And beyond the upped sense of shared experience, a library book offers chance to editorialize that a book owned by only you does not. (In my own books, no one else will ever see my “holy crap!s” or “fuck this shit” or all the squiggly underlines when I like something a lot.) But there on page 173 of The Brotherhood of the Grape, a short novel by John Fante about a tyrannical Italian-American father and his middle-aged writer son that I borrowed from the shiny, bright, newly renovated Cambridge Public Library, there, towards the bottom of the page, a word eclipsed by thick black marker:

      “‘God help you, baby,’ Virgil smirked.

      ‘You [eclipsed] bank clerk!’ she raged. You’re not fit to clean Mario’s shoes!’”

      If you hold it to the light, you see “fucking” behind the marker scrawl.

      Elsewhere, a whole phrase gets crossed out:

      “‘You want some action?’

      She reached for my fly and I backed away.

      ‘God, no.’

      ‘Any way you [eclipsed…]’

It’s difficult to see, but easy enough to guess. “Any way you want it. I suck, too.”Or “I fuck, too.”

Perhaps, if I were a more frequent borrower of books, this sort of censorship would annoy -- that someone would take it upon themselves to hoist their own principles on swears and sex on future readers. A sort of moral vandalism. But this time, those marker-blackened words served in showing me that other humans had held this book and had been moved enough to speak to readers down the line. For me, it made an argument for borrowing, for using and giving back, for a private act becoming something shared. 

Posted by Nina MacLaughlin | link

Darling Honks, Thank you SO much for the HEVERN eveninger, [Nanny] was ‘dumbfounded’ when Nancy told her what it cost. I honestly never seen anything quite so lovely in all my life. I even forgive you being a fascist for that. Thanks ever so much. Best love from Debo

The New Criterion profiles the political missteps of the Mitfords and the recent reissue of Nancy Mitford's Wigs on the Green.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

Good piece on the endless conversation about poetry's relevance, from Poetry Magazine, to Lipsky's book about David Foster Wallace:

“Do you worry that fiction could end up becoming the kind of pleasant hobbyist’s backwater that reading poetry has become?”

“If it does,” Wallace replies, “it won’t be the audience’s fault. And it won’t be TV’s fault.”

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

May 11, 2010

Cordelia Jenkins has a charming piece on trying to check Salmon Fishing in Yemen out of a Delhi library. (Via)

“I’d like to take this book out please,” I began, smiling encouragingly. “No,” said the man. “It is not possible to take books. You must read it here,” he nodded as if that were an end to the matter. Faced with this kind of negative certitude, some might have been dissuaded. Not me. My prior experience of worldwide library protocol gave me the courage to insist. I repeated the question a couple of times receiving the same response (Einstein’s definition of insanity) and finally opened the front of the book to point out the borrowing stamps in violet ink. “Yes,” said the librarian, cheerfully contradicting himself, “you must be a member to take books away.” Here we go, I thought. “I’d like to become a member,” I said.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

Okay, so, whatever, Fay Weldon thinks she has psychic powers and she's talking about in public now. After the whole "I am the only real feminist" thing and the "everyone should be forcibly put on birth control" controversies, and those are just the ones I remember off the top of my head, this seems pretty tame. No, my favorite bit of the story has nothing to do with her sixth sense, it's the final paragraph, stuck on as the best non sequitur ever written.

Like all guests on Desert Island Discs, Weldon was asked what luxury item she would take with her as a castaway. She chose a shotgun.

She is obviously not as crazy as she is playing.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

For those of you who thought Michiko was too harsh on Yann Martel, wait until you read the first three words of her review of the new Martin Amis, The Pregnant Widow. "This remarkably tedious..." Michiko cares not for your scorn.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

May 10, 2010

Today's literary award shortlist round-up is dedicated to the grumpalicious Thomas Bernhard, as his Old Masters is re-issued as part of Penguin's jazzy Central Europe series. In the novel Bernhard writes that "to award someone a prize is no different from pissing on him". Let's see who is in line to get pissed on this month.

The two big UK children's book award shortlists have been released, the Carnegie Medal shortlist 2010 and the Kate Greenaway award nominees 2010.

The Samuel Johnston Prize for Non-Fiction longlist is now out. I think it's between Kynaston and Spurling; wonder what Orlando Figes reckons?

The International Prize for Foreign Fiction 2010 contenders:
Brodeck's Report by Philippe Claudel

The Blind Side of the Heart by Julia Franck

Fists by Pietro Grossi

Broken Glass by Alain Mabanckou

The Dark Side of Love by Rafik Schami

Chowringhee by Sankar

Posted by Margaret Howie | link

A friend on the phone yesterday, in response to my reference to Wetlands: (dismissively) "I have never read a book with a pink cover." What he is missing out on, from my own shelf:

Chanel and Her World
Family Ties by Clarice Lispector
Lucinella by Lore Segal
Wish Her Safe at Home by Stephen Benatar (a dude!)
Pussycat Fever by Kathy Acker

And that's from my post-international move book purging. There would have been others had my full library been available for my weird, sudden need to defend pink books.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

Tom Bartlett has written an appreciation for Walker Percy's strange and overlooked Lost in the Cosmos: The Last Self-Help Book, with a couple of excerpts. Like this one:

Question: Do Chicagoans in Burbank, California, applaud at the mention of the word Chicago
(a) Because they are proud of Chicago?
(b) Because they are boosters, Chamber of Commerce types, who appreciate a plug, much as a toothpaste manufacturer would appreciate Carson mentioning Colgate?
(c) Because a person, particularly a passive audience member who finds himself in Burbank, California, feels himself so dislocated, so detached from a particular coordinate in space and time, so ghostly, that the very mention of such a coordinate is enough to startle him into action? (Check one)

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

The Second Virtue

1960s and '70s cookbooks inspire a gaudy fascination, their madcap culinary creations documented in photographs with a lurid intensity. This jazzy reworking of Mrs Beeton, published in 1969, is no exception. Offering traditional recipes ("brains and egg on toast," anyone?), as well as modish alternatives, it’s the "up-to-the-minute ideas for serving and garnishing," the design of the food on the plate, that make the book such a peculiar spectacle.

Many of the serving suggestions are so novel as to disguise the food presented entirely: a meatloaf covered in what looks like icing, for example, or sandwiches made to look like ice cream cones. The innovation of frozen peas also appears to have had a dramatic effect: in the garish spread of "meat and sweet dishes" every savoury plate is showered with them, and purveyor of peas, Birds Eye Foods, get a mention in the acknowledgements. 

The "serving and garnishing" of the book itself, the cover design and the graphics, are also of its time. Accompanying the brassy cover photographs are fantastic stylised illustrations of cutlery and salt and pepper pots in bright red and blue. Inside, I particularly like the grotesquery of the plates showing different cuts of meat: cross-sections of carcasses and animal heads with tongues lolling out. And the introductory chapter on "housewifery" is illustrated with a photograph of a "contemporary kitchen," complete with formica units, textured wallpaper, and a coordinated colour scheme of orange, lime green and baby blue. 

Tracing the numerous incarnations of Mrs Beeton’s classic, Cookery and Household Management, since its original publication in 1861 would provide an interesting history of trends in food as well as in cook book publishing. But this edition stands alone as a snapshot of 1960s domesticity and design.

Posted by Catherine Gregg | link

Related to my Smart Set column about Art as Plunder: Michael Kimmelman* updates Egypt's case for the return of the Nefertiti bust, and they are also now demanding the return of the Rosetta Stone. It's a play for nationalism versus universality of art, and his article is worth reading.

* Michael Kimmelman being the author of the incredibly charming and wonderful essay collection The Accidental Masterpiece.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

May 07, 2010

Joanna Kavenna, whose Inglorious I oh dear lord loved and fretted over, worried the character was going to come to a bad end and then I would collapse and cry, has a new book! It is called The Birth of Love. She talks about the book here, why she was so taken with the story of the doctor who discovered the cause of childbirth fever Ignaz Semmelweis (no one believed him, he went mad and was institutionalized, muttering about the blood of women he had on his hands) and the dangers of any kind of dogma.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

Troy Patterson on not reading Ralph Ellison's unfinished and yet now published Three Days Before the Shooting.

Three Days Before the Shooting...—a complete edition of that uncompleted second book, a gathering of "the various parts Ellison's planned opus in an unadorned fashion"—is a book I am not going to read. Beyond being unadorned (which, at the hastiest of skims, seems to be code for roughly hewn and totally shapeless) the "novel" is quite long—1,100 pages all told. Thus, although the Modern Library published the book in January, it's taken me quite a while to get around to not reading it.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

A Jim Behrle Production

























Posted by Jim Behrle | link

I have to admit a lingering fascination with Charlotte Roche's Wetlands, despite requiring three attempts to get all the way through it without being overcome with nausea, and online discussions that devolved into crazy. A conversation with Katy Derbyshire, translator and writer at Love German Books, regarding the kind of language and culture that created Wetlands in the first place reignited it. (I was shocked when I first learned the German words for certain areas of female anatomy. Vagina and Penis might be clinical and awkward, but that's nothing compared to the words the Germans use for their stuff.) I asked Katy to extend our conversation over email, and being that she is a wonderful and lovely human being, she agreed. We discuss anatomy lessons, what the hell is going on with the Germans, and why for a while everyone in Europe was reading Wetlands.

If I remember correctly, we were at a book release shindig for a guide to Berlin's clubs, which we are maybe both too old to have any use for (I am maybe just speaking for myself, because I cringed when they started talking about illegal clubs that release their location on Facebook and you have to go searching for), and the subject of the English translation of Wetlands came up. About which you have opinions. Not that the translation itself is bad, but that half of the point of the book is to create better words for female body parts than German currently has, and that gets lost in the English version. Can you explain what you meant?

I think the author would dispute the idea that the book is a guide to clubs - being the Spiegel's pop editor. But essentially it's not wrong. And yes, I certainly felt too old and was amazed that people could spend an entire evening philosophizing about what they themselves called "going out".

There's an interview with Tim Mohr, Wetland's English translator, in the BILD. You can click through his choices for the difficult parts to get a general idea.

Anyway I recall one aspect that got people excited about the book in the first place (or interested me, at least) was that Roche created new words for female genitalia (Perlenrüssel / pearl trunk for clitoris and Hahnenkämme / cockscomb for the labia minor (is that what they're called?)). And that was part of why it was a feminist book -- because she was saying, Look what awful words we use -- Schamlippen for God's sake, because we all have to be ashamed of them. And reclaiming the female body if you like by renaming it.

Whereas in English we don't have that whole shame aspect rooted in the language -- so the new names come across as slightly silly rather than an act of linguistic liberation. I don't know whether Tim really did stick with "snail tail" for clitoris -- and I don't want to go into whether a woman would have found a more appetizing image -- but it's certainly less -um- celebratory than Roche's act of reconquering.

I haven't read the translation so I can't possibly judge the quality. But it seems to me that the whole issue is impossible to retain in translation and that it's a key part of what makes it a feminist text.

The other examples in that BILD piece are the strange scatalogical stuff Roche had in the book, where she deliberately used baby-language like "Kackwurst", and of course you lose all that contrast when the genital stuff is silly too.

For our non-German speaking readers, let's give a little tour of what the existing names of female body parts are. I was in Berlin for about two weeks when someone informed me that the direct translation of the German for nipple was "breast wart." That is some hardcore Lutheran your-body-is-a-cesspool-even-the-parts-you-use-to-nourish-your-children shit. It just gets worse from there. What are some of the others?


Number one has to be der Scham (which also means just plain old shame) for what my picture dictionary calls "pudenda (vulva)" in English. Hence the lips of shame (Schamlippen), hair of shame (Schamhaare), area of shame (Schambereich), etc. Oh, and Scheide for vagina, literally the sheath for putting a sword into. Oh God, how hilarious, the picture dictionary calls the clitoris der Kitzler -- I always thought that was slang because it means a thing that tickles or thing for tickling.

My dictionaries tell me this Scham thing comes from the fact that we cover our genitals. German doesn't use Latin medical terms like English, so things often come across as rather blunt to English-speaking (or listening) ears -- the uterus is the Gebärmutter or something like "birthing mother" and the ovaries are Eierstöcke or egg-sticks (possibly egg-stocks, etymologically). Then there's the Muttermund for the uterine orifice -- one of those things you only know you have when you get pregnant, and the image of it opening to spit out the baby is, ummm...

You have the same bluntness with illnesses too, so tonsilitis is Mandelentzündung or swollen tonsils, pancreatitis is Bauchspeicheldrüsenentzündung or swelling of the gland that makes stomach-spit, etc. But somehow that's not so burdened with body hate.

There must be slang for genitalia currently in use in German, or else dirty talk here has got to be weird. (Although still, the idea of a young girl being taught her body literally carries the name of shame... God.) When translating, how do you navigate turning a German sex scene into English?

I think sex is pretty universal, and yes there is slang. What I try to do is find a term that hits the right register in English. Some are easy enough like pussy for Muschi - a common pet name for cats that the prominent Bavarian politician Edmund Stoiber uses as a term of endearment for his wife. And sometimes I just choose the word I like best - the Germans use the slang term Schwanz, meaning literally tail and relatively harmless, for the penis, and I try and pick the English word that best fits the situation, sometimes thinking about things like pronunciation - dick is so tight-lipped, it doesn't always work for me, I prefer a more juicy word. Otherwise I sit at my desk waving my arms and legs around to try and imagine what's going on there on the page. And lots and lots of Urban Dictionary.

There was a sense, and I think it was even stated out loud, in the US and UK that the success of Wetlands was proof something was fundamentally wrong with the Germans. You were here, working in the literary world, when the book came out. What was the critical response like?

Well no one here thought it reflected on the Germans as a nation. Charlotte Roche is actually seen as English over here, having been born in the UK, but nobody cast critical aspersions on British sexual practices either. I suppose the general culprit was the younger generation - something we've seen with the reception of Helene Hegemann's Axolotl Roadkill too. So some critics assumed both books were telling universal truths about young people's lives - and a lot of readers found it difficult to distinguish between the writers and the characters, which I think got both Roche and Hegemann into trouble.

Otherwise the response was mixed - people enjoyed a good argument over the book and literally almost everybody read it. There were critics who loved it, thought it was a breath of fresh air, daring and honest - and very funny. And then there were some who found it downright nauseating, and others who looked at its literary value and found it rather wanting. Plus it reheated the feminist debate over whether it's OK to enjoy porn and kinky sex, which was fun.

And you? Did you read it? What did you think?

I read half of it, and then it got too much for me. I found the whole fucked-up kid thing slightly upsetting, the way the character can get her private parts shaved by a complete stranger but not fart in public. But I liked the way it was written.
Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

May 06, 2010


The Poetry Foundation has changed Harriet, their valuable blog about poetry, into yet another poetry news aggregator. Which is fine, right? I'm hardly one to sneer at link roundups. I did enjoy this bit, however: Also, anyone involved in the more dynamic discussions of poetry, poetics, or politics in the past year knows that more and more of the most vibrant interactions have been found on Facebook. We saw this happening last month as our National Poetry Month posts traveled far and wide through various status updates, wall postings, and links. Setting aside the troubling issues of privacy and coterie this brings up, it would be foolish to deny it as a fact of the revolution. Setting aside, then, the concern that contemporary poetry might be even more cliquish and even inaccessible than it is already? Good luck with that.

Springsteen and Pinksy, two Jersey boys at heart: Both spoke fondly of their home state, though in different ways. Pinsky, who grew up in "not the greatest part of Long Branch" and now lives in western Massachusetts, realized after he moved to California that he missed the Garden State's speech patterns and sarcasm; Springsteen dreamed of getting out of New Jersey as a youth but later came to find meaning in "a certain plot of ground, a certain place" after his work became more introspective.

Mike Chasar, whose "Poetry and Popular Culture" blog I've long enjoyed, has a poem of "Little Known Clauses in Arizona's New Immigration Law."

Suzanne Steele discusses being embedded in Afghanistan as an official war poet: Steele said the soldiers accepted a woman so different from them that she may as well have been from the moon -- although they quickly branded her a 'kit bomb', an army derogative for soldiers who spread their gear messily around their quarters -- and she still keeps in contact with many of those she met.

Finally, an obligatory link to the video of Bill Murray reading Emily Dickinson to construction workers.

Posted by Jason B. Jones | link

Michelle Goldberg reviews Elaine Tyler May's America and the Pill: A History of Promise, Peril, and Liberation.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

Chicago writer Peter Ferry (he wrote the very good novel Travel Writing) goes in search of Neal Cassidy's ghost in San Miguel de Allende, where he "died ignominiously" in the '60s.

Neal Cassady had officially done almost nothing, but he had managed to fascinate and inspire some of the most interesting and creative minds of two generations. He’s a person you’d give almost anything to have spent time with. I wanted to find someone who had.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

Industrious Michael Schaub has another review at NPR.org, for Julie Orringer's The Invisible Bridge, which he has been trying to get me to read for weeks. But it's set before WWII and his review has the word "Nazi" in it, and I am done with Nazis. But it does sound good, and those who are not Hitler fatigued should probably read it.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

Roger Cohen writes a love letter to Hans Fallada's Every Man Dies Alone:

What Irène Némirovsky’s “Suite Française” did for wartime France after six decades in obscurity, Fallada does for wartime Berlin. Like all great art, it transports, in this instance to a world where, “The Third Reich kept springing surprises on its antagonists: It was vile beyond all vileness.”

Another remarkable book that unfortunately seems to have disappeared a little in the States is The Silences of Hammerstein. It's poet Hans Magnus Enzensberger's investigation into whether one could retain both one's soul and life in wartime Germany, and the remarkable Hammerstein family. The father was head of the army until 1933, an outspoken critic against Hitler, who considered shooting him in the head but decided the consequences would be too dire and raised a family full of communist spies and resistance fighters. One son participated in the July 20th assassination/coup attempt. It's a great book, so smartly done, and sadly seems to have been overlooked by just about everyone.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

May 05, 2010

This is awesome: Erica Jong on the 50th birthday of the birth control pill (happy birthday, Pill!). She is hilarious and she speaks the truth.

Also, maybe pick up a copy of This Man's Pill if you can find it. I don't think it ever made it into paperback. Also, maybe watch a documentary about the unethical testing they did on non-consenting women for the Pill. We can't have you feeling too great about the world and advancement and all that.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

Michael Schaub reviews David Lipsky's Although Of Course You End Up Becoming Yourself: A Road Trip with David Foster Wallace at NPR.

It's impossible for anyone who ever fell in love with Wallace's prose not to read Lipsky's account looking for clues. And while suicide is never really logical, it's heartbreaking to read Wallace discuss his history of depression: "I think somebody who's been in a suicide ward is either way better prepared or way less prepared. Because I mean, I don't think we ever change. I'm sure there are still those same parts of me. I've just got to find a way to not let them drive."

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

My reading has been playing the worst game of Six Degrees ever. No matter what I read, it ends up with the Nazis. Sometimes the connection is obvious, and I know about it going in, like The Silences of Hammerstein (head of the army in Weimar Germany, not the musical theatre dude) or the book about the Wagners. Other times it sneaks up on me, like when I was reading about Shakespeare & Company founder Sylvia Beach, who all of a sudden is arrested by the Nazis and thrown into a prison camp. Or Coco Chanel, who everything is going along perfectly well for, and then starts dating a Nazi soldier. Or the subject of my latest Smart Set column, Art as Plunder, which I thought was about Rome, but then starts talking about the Nazis. I was going to read Miranda Carter's George, Nicholas, and Wilhelm next, but you can imagine the Nazi correlations just from the title. I need a breather.

But the column itself is mostly not about Nazis, although the way the Swiss profited from WWII does sneak its way in. But mostly about the idea of owning an antiquity, about looting, about Egypt suddenly bullying France and Germany for the relics in their collections and why they're doing that, and vae victus.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

May 04, 2010

Hey, guess which online literary magazine just turned eight? That's right! It is this one! We're pleased to announce the eighth anniversary issue of Bookslut, born in 2002 in Austin, Texas. (Specifically, in Jessa's apartment in a hilariously sketchy neighborhood which I affectionately call "Stabtown.") That's right -- we've finally met our goal of being around longer than both the Reagan administration and James at 15.

This month, we've got more great features than you can shake a stick at, assuming you can only shake a stick at seven great features. Check out Elizabeth Bachner's essay on why great poems matter; Micah McCrary's reflections on creative nonfiction; and Gordon Haber's hilarious observations on book title trends. We've also got essays by Barbara J. King and Richard Wirick, as well as interviews with Tomás Harris, Sonya Chung, and Maria Finn. Our columnists are back to school you on everything from mushrooms (not the awesome kind, but still) to New Zealand comic artists. And our reviewers discuss the latest from Sam Lipsyte, C. K. Williams, Shameem Black, Chang-rae Lee, Anne Lamott, Kevin Fanning, and more.

Thanks so much for your support over these past eight years. Jessa and I worked on this issue for months, each of us flying back and forth between Berlin and Portland, just to make sure this is the best issue of anything ever. As a special treat for our readers, here's an actual excerpt from a Google Chat conversation she and I had last night. Just so you can see how the magic happens.

Jessa: oh!
happy anniversary!
it is our 8th anniversary issue!

Michael: oh wait
really?
fuck!

Jessa: god, I totally forgot

Michael: i guess we should write something about that
damn!

Jessa: probably
ugh

Michael: ha ha
i know

Jessa: yes

Michael: let's just use this gchat conversation as the blog post announcing the issue

Jessa: yes

Michael: and just really confuse everyone

Jessa: I think that is an excellent idea

The vast, vast majority of that conversation has been redacted, per our attorneys' advice, but you get the idea. Thanks for your support, and happy reading.

Posted by Michael Schaub | link

You’re Raskolnikov, a student radical in St. Petersburg. Somebody’s stolen your birthright. Somebody’s gonna pay.

Crime and Punishment: The Video Game. It's only a matter of time.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

On the Oliver Himes biography of Cosima Wagner:

1. I picked it up because a strange man on the subway, who seemed perfectly normal in that he looked like he bathed on a regular basis, was not wearing three belts or ladies clothing (unlike the transvestite who hangs around another subway stop I frequent), accosted me as I sat waiting for the train. "You are Cosima Wagner!" Uh, no. "You are exactly her! It is eerie!" Some of his explanation was lost as he switched between very rapid German and English, and it took me weeks to figure out what he was talking about. But then, yes. I have her nose. I saw the cover of the biography. Seemed like a good a reason to read it as any.

2. It's not so much the Guardian review of the book, as it is the author photo. Why am I not wearing a jaunty hat in my author photo?

3. The book came around the same time as the Eva Braun assignment and some Mitford reading, and soon the "Ah yes, Hitler came around for tea today" stuff started to eat my brain. I shouted at Cosima Wagner through the pages at some point, "Don't serve him tea! Poison him you nitwit!"

4. Cosima was a bit batshit. She refused to let them take Wagner's body out of her bed, after his death.

5. I am forever grateful to this book, however, for making me finally go see Wagner operas. Even if I got chastised last night by Herr Engels, a professor of one of my friends, for liking the Deutsche Oper production of Rienzi. "No, you're wrong. We did not care for it."

6. It is nice and all that translation has become part of the literary conversation, and I agree with the Guardian review that the English translation of the Himes is clunky. He reuses a handful of idioms over and over and over again. But the discussion in the comments, about the improper translation of the word "Spätburgunder" is tedious, and this is generally what the conversation about translation devolves into: whether particular words were properly translated, rather than the music of the whole piece. Stewart Spencer did a fine job balancing the academic tone with readability, but got a little lazy in the transitions.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

May 03, 2010

I'm doing some blogging for the PBS Need to Know website. First up, five books to look forward to this summer:

The Terrible Privacy of Maxwell Sim by Jonathan Coe (UK release only, but that is why God gave us international shipping options)
Old Men in Love by Alasdair Gray
The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet by David Mitchell
The Mountain Lion by Jean Stafford
Private Lives of Trees by Alejandro Zambra

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

We live in the world, and I feel like the Oscars are as important to me as the state of poetry.

Charming interview with poet Dorothea Grossman at the Poetry Foundation.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link

The Second Virtue

Quilts 1700-2010, the V&A’s first major exhibition to focus on British patchwork and quilt making has opened after much anticipation: 8,000 pre-ordered tickets and hotels booked up in the South Kensington area. 

Embedded within the domestic landscape, the stories underpinning many of these quilts, personal narratives woven into the fabric, are those that so often escape the history books. Passed down through generations, quilts serve as repositories of memory, and are rich sources of social history. Pieced together from fragments, reanimating pre-loved materials, they often incorporate embroidered or printed text. And it’s not only the decorative side that tells a story.  Research on one of the patchworks on display, an unfinished coverlet dated 1829, unravelled a paper trail of myth, history and romance.  

The coverlet is framed by text: letters document its acquisition by the museum, words form part of its decoration and, used as templates, a range of personal papers and printed scraps play an integral role in its structure. An embroidered verse, eulogising a wife and commending her lucky husband on his conquest, suggests that the coverlet commemorates a marriage, that of "John and Elizabeth Chapman." A love poem at first glance, the verse has been traced to a collection of epitaphs, a popular literary genre of the period. This particular epitaph was written in 1775 for an eccentric inventor, Martin Van Butchell, who embalmed his first wife Mary and kept her in a glass case for posterity.  

Letters in the museum’s accession documents suggest that the mysteries of the Chapman quilt, and why it was abandoned unfinished, might be uncovered by turning to the pieced-in paper templates exposed at the back. Family tradition held that the Chapman’s love letters were used for these patchwork templates. Central to the myth surrounding the coverlet, this story draws on the assumption that a conscientious maker would remove these papers before backing, unless they had particular significance. However, a close reading of the coverlet led to rather different conclusions. 

Papers used for the piecing-in templates on the Chapman and other similar coverlets of the period are of four main types. Children’s copybooks are the most numerous: in the Chapman quilt, written in several hands, they repeat sums, grammatical sentences and so on. Second are personal papers, including ledger accounts, bills and indeed correspondence (though only one scrap in the Chapman quilt uses the word "dear"). Third are printed papers such as pamphlets, newspapers, invitations and announcements. Lastly, and least numerous, are blank papers. Paper was handmade until the nineteenth century and therefore expensive; waste paper was a valuable household commodity, reused over a long time, and ultimately used in the loo. 

Several of the papers in the Chapman quilt relate to Rochester town-council events and others document purchases from a Rochester wine merchant. This helped to place the maker amongst the upper-middle class in that town. But ruling out love letters, the romance of the quilt seemed to lie in its painstaking construction over many years and its quality as a family heirloom, rather than in the materials of which it was made. The mystery remains as to why the papers were left inside.  

Posted by Catherine Gregg | link

Charles Simic reflects on being poet laureate.

I don’t know if you are aware of this, but our poet laureates are not called upon to write occasional poems. The position is privately endowed—originally from a fund set up by industrialist scion Arthur M. Huntington in 1936—since it is unimaginable that the Congress of the United States would ever agree to part with a penny for the purpose of promoting poetry. The Republicans, especially, are always worried that someone in the arts is undermining the religious and family values of our country. They suspect poets of being subversives, free-thinkers, sex-fiends, and drug addicts. Their fears are not entirely without foundation. There have not been many American poets, living or dead, you’d want to bring home to meet your grandmother or have speak to your Bible study group.

Posted by Jessa Crispin | link













Front Row King sells concert tickets and event tickets worldwide.
Book a hotel room online at Hotel Room King.


Download Ebook at Docbig.com

Free books portal

Great Dresses Deals

Custom essay writing help from experts at AdvancedWriters.com service.




RSS Feed

Join Ultrasound Technician schools to become certified sonographer.

http://mycustomessay.com - writing service.

http://essaycamp.com - essay writing company

For custom written book reviews and college research papers visit http://123writings.com - a legitimate custom writing company.